The reading and discussion of this apocalyptic poetry has me significantly concerned with the personified notion of Darkness. Darkness has been represented across all forms of media in a multitude of powerful forms. I suppose the purpose of this post is to hone in on a better sense of “Darkness” as represented by this week’s authors. In our discussion today, Professor Porter located the idea of Darkness portrayed by Byron as a force that “had no need / Of aid from them,” them being aspects of nature such as waves, tides, moon, air and the clouds (Byron 81-82). As a personification, Darkness “was the Universe,” She exists as an ultimate end-state, the being that exists after our existence ends. In a sense, Darkness here represents the nothingness of what the Universe and existence is after our human existence (and thus our ability to evaluate and explain the Universe) ends. This nothingness highlights our self-made ideas of the Universe, and in the context of the poem, reflects the way we evaluate and justify ourselves by looking at another man’s existence (see fugliness that kills – line 66). It is more difficult for me to pinpoint Thomas Campbell’s notion of Darkness in “The Last Man,” perhaps because it is blurred by religious connotation. He clearly separates Death and Darkness, although “The majesty of Darkness shall / Receive [his] parting ghost”. For
Monday, November 14, 2011
Darkness
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think the beginning of this blog points out a very significant point that I think is the crucial argument on the relationship between man and nature. Man sees nature through man-made perceptions. Man's relationship with nature is an experience built upon another experience.
ReplyDelete