Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Ode to a Nightingale

This poem is about escape, through the transitory nature of a nightingale's song or through poetry. At the beginning of the poem, the speaker's "heart aches," and he is numb as if he had taken a drug. He wishes for an escape through alcohol. He wants to "fade far away" and forget the pain the nightingale "hast never known." He decides instead to fly to the nightingale not with alcohol "but on the viewless wings of Poesy." Poetry has no boundaries for him, it is viewless. He creates for himself an escape from his troubles by writing poetry. In his imaginings of being with the nightingale out at night, or his imaginings while he is writing poetry, he abandons his sense of sight, "I cannot see," and instead "I listen." Poetry makes himi aware of the world in a different way. In musing about the escape through poetry, he muses about another escape, death. Listening to the bird's song, "now more than ever seems it rich to die." Yet if he died, he would not be able to hear the bird's continued song. Death provides a permanent escape, but it seems he would rather keep listening to the bird's song, or keep writing. He is commenting on the transience of human life and how nature and poetry survive it. The voice of poetry and the nightingale has been heard through the generations. Still, the thought of one word "forlorn," brings him back to reality. He is forlorn, not the nightingale because it will never know his pains, so he immediately is brought back to himself. The act of creatively expressing oneself is transitory. The bird's song is fleeting, it is a temporary escape for him just as writing his poetry can only be a temporary escape from life. He wonders if he is awake or asleep by the end, showing how his creative expression can change his perceptions of the world around him.

2 comments:

  1. When I first read this poem I wondered why Keats switched from the theme of immortality to transience so abruptly between the last two stanzas. The narrator (arguably Keats himself) states, "Forlorn! / the very word is like a bell
/ To toll me back from thee to my sole self!" I do agree that these lines refer to the contrast between the nightingale who feels no pain, and the narrator. Yet this difference was mentioned earlier in the poem without prompting Keats to create a separation between them and they were connected conceptually up until the penultimate stanza. I wonder if another reason for this sudden departure is that the narrator realizes that even though he may be immortalized through poetry, this makes no difference to him in the present state and like it will make no difference to him when he is dead, just like how he would have "ears in vain" if he died as he could not hear the nightingale singing. Despite the fact that he may live through poetry the narrator still feels forlorn in the present, and this word tolls like the bell of a clock, reminding him of the passing of time, his mortality, and the present moment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lauren I think that one reason Keats makes a separation between the narrator and the speaker at the end of the poem is to represent a physical separation, which in turn causes the speaker to again go back to a state of sorrow. When the nightingale leaves, the speaker is no longer connected to that melodious singing and therefore, will again return to sadness. This is the difference between the nightingale and the speaker. The nightingale continues on singing and supposedly unfeeling of pain while the speaker leaves and again returns to blatant sorrow. Their separation as well as their connection have a profound effect on the speaker's internal status.

    ReplyDelete