Wednesday, November 9, 2011

To a Sky-Lark

Whereas Keats escaped the pains of living through poetry or listening to the nightingale's song, Shelley longs to be taught the "clear keen joyance" of the sky-lark. Keats begins his poem thinking of himself, then escapes from himself and thinks of the nightingale, and then is snapped back to reality abruptly and his reality is changed from the experience (is he awake or asleep?). In contrast, Shelley begins by describing the sky-lark, moves to trying to compare the sky-lark to different things but never finding the right one, and then comes in the poem as the speaker and asks the bird to "teach me" his gladness, his "harmonious madness," so Shelley can then teach the world using his own harmonious madness, poetry. Both the sky-lark and the nightingale are inspired and removed from the pain the poets feel. The nightingale makes Keats think of death, whereas the sky-lark makes Shelley think of life and joy. Keats ends separated from his nightingale, "fled is the music;" he is removed and his escape is temporary. Shelley ends still listening to the music, "I am listening now;" he continues to try to learn from the sky-lark and keeps listening.

2 comments:

  1. I think both poets acknowledge the typical sadness and busyness of mankind as you suggest. I see Shelley as a more optimistic happy fellow who plainly enjoys the singing of the sky-lark and thinks how to serve this happiness to his fellow man while Keats, like you said, is just temporarily glad that the nightingale can take away his sadness. Keats wants to die because he has felt some joy and can now die satisfied while Shelley wishes to continue to live and soak up nature's joys. The sky-lark and the nightingale represent the same ideals for both poets but I think Keats and Shelley are analyzing the bird from two different emotional perspectives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with both Adam and Cole on their arguments, especially with the analysis of Keats. It seems that these poets take either two avenues when approaching nature: they are either ignorantly blissful, like Shelley, or painfully realistic, like Keats and Charlotte Smith. Keats approach with his piece about the nightingale reminds me of the poems of Smith, noting the failure of nature to overcome the worries and pains of the human world. Somewhat depressing, but, I think, better than the John Lennon-like approach of Shelley, which leaves me wondering how a man could think on such levels.

    ReplyDelete